Did you know…?

ThermoFisher Scientific describe transfection as the “process of artificially introducing nucleic acids (DNA or RNA) into cells… using various chemical, biological, or physical methods” which “can result in a change of the properties of the cell”.1Archived link https://web.archive.org/web/20150822122542/https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/references/gibco-cell-culture-basics/transfection-basics/introduction-to-transfection.html

Across its decades of use2e.g. Lipofectamine, an early transfection product, was launched in 1993; see also this 1989 paper. as a laboratory tool for initiating changes that were only ever going to be studied in the short-term, repeated inquiries have been made into transfection’s inherently toxic effects.3e.g. in 1997 Basis of pulmonary toxicity associated with cationic lipid-mediated gene transfer to the mammalian lung (archived link); in 2000 Comprehensive analysis of the acute toxicities induced by systemic administration of cationic lipid:plasmid DNA complexes in mice (archived link); in 2003 Transfection efficiency and toxicity following delivery of naked plasmid DNA and cationic lipid–DNA complexes to ovine lung segments (archived link); in 2005 Toxicity of cationic lipid-DNA complexes (archived link); in 2007 Breaking up the correlation between efficacy and toxicity for nonviral gene delivery
(archived link); in 2012 Cellular Toxicity Caused by Transfection: Why is it important? (archived link); in 2014 Relating Toxicity to Transfection: Using Sphingosine To Maintain Prolonged Expression in Vitro (archived link); in 2019 Alkylation enhances biocompatibility and siRNA delivery efficiency of cationic curdlan nanoparticles (archived link); also 2019 Polymeric siRNA gene delivery – transfection efficiency versus cytotoxicity (archived link); in 2023 Improving cell and gene therapy safety and performance using next-generation Nanoplasmid vectors (archived link)

Which means:

  1. each COVID-19 mRNA injection is a transfection – not a “vaccine”

  2. and any side-effects are predictable outcomes of transfection – not “vaccine injuries”.

Yet, strangely, these obvious points remain unhighlighted and undiscussed – even by those in the supposedly anti-vax, health-freedom movement.

As Dr. Marcus de Brun has observed “the introduction of synthetic genes into vegetables, created something of an international furore, yet the transfection of synthetic genes into millions of regular human beings has created far less controversy.” 4Archived link: https://web.archive.org/web/20210409113426/https://cassandravoices.com/science-environment/science/healthy-people-do-not-require-genetic-vaccination/. Archived link: https://archive.ph/VCMEt

Which prompts the question…

Were You Informed?

(Problems with video? Try on Odysee or Bitchute)

About Jonathan Jay Couey

(Problems with video? Try on Odysee or Bitchute)


Video sources:

Screenshot sources:


Footnotes